← Search

Tara Cormier-Reeder

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dallas, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 111W–48L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history159 matches
L
2026-10-23 · Team 23 Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Olds
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-16 · Team 23 Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Foster
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-09 · Team 23 Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kerrie Davis
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-10-02 · Team 23 Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Houstoun
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-18 · Team 23 Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Britt Kramer
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · Canyon Creek/Leary W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Britt Kramer
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-13 · Canyon Creek/Leary W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Leary
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-04 · Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheila Sergiovanni
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-30 · Canyon Creek/Leary W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Britt Kramer
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-23 · Canyon Creek/Leary W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Britt Kramer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-21 · Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0T · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Britt Kramer
loading the estimate
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0T · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Britt Kramer
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
79.5%
58W–15L · 61.6% of games
4.0
62.3%
38W–23L · 54.4% of games
7.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 56.2% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 38.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
36 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert