← Search

Laura Reynolds

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dallas, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
145 matches · 114W–31L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history145 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Team 12 Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marci Addington
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-23 · Team 2 Oak Creek/Newberg-Musick W4.0F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marci Addington
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-11 · Team 12 Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Thornton
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-10-10 · Team 12 Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Thornton
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-09 · Team 2 Oak Creek/Newberg-Musick W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Kvale
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Thornton
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-04 · Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.0T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Thornton
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-31 · Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.0T · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Thornton
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-30 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Thornton
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-14 · Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Thornton
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-07 · Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.0T · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Thornton
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-02 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Nammari
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
78.9%
112W–30L · 61.7% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer