← Search

Gretel Sampson

Salt Lake City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
403 matches · 201W–202L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gretel Sampson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history403 matches
L
2026-08-06 · Liberty Park-Swensen/ Benton · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Swensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-30 · Liberty Park-Swensen/ Benton · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alisa Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · Liberty Park-Swensen/ Benton · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Benton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · with Annette Knight championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-29 · Wasatch Hills-Swensen/Sampson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annette Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-08 · Eccles- CJS · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Curtis Sampson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-07 · Wasatch Hills-Swensen/Sampson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-24 · Eccles- CJS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Curtis Sampson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-04-10 · Eccles- CJS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Curtis Sampson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
Jennifer Johnson / Kelley Epstein
2026-04-09 · Wasatch Hills-Swensen/Sampson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alena Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-03-13 · Eccles-CJS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Curtis Sampson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-12 · Wasatch Hills-Swensen/Sampson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annette Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams95 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 55.7% of games
3.5
64.1%
100W–56L · 54.6% of games
4.0
28.7%
43W–107L · 42.4% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.2% of games
7.5mixed
84.2%
16W–3L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
127 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
111 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
90 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
22 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
13 matches
#1 Singles
3%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer