← Search

Elizabeth Garnett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 52W–54L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history106 matches
L
2026-11-03 · Willow Oaks 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sharon Fuller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-02 · WOCC Stringer 3.5 WeekDay · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Pisano
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-29 · WOCC Stringer 3.5 WeekDay · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zinie Sampson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · WOCC Stringer 3.5 WeekDay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Berry
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-10 · WOCC Stringer 3.5 WeekDay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Burris
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · WOCC Stringer 3.5 WeekDay · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Pisano
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · 20 Willow Oaks Stringer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Burris
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-10 · 20 Willow Oaks Stringer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Pisano
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-08 · 20 Willow Oaks Stringer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne-Marie Anderson
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · 20 Willow Oaks Stringer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Pisano
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-22 · 23 Haas 7.0 WOCC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Port mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · 23 Haas 7.0 WOCC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Port mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 58.8% of games
3.5
48.3%
28W–30L · 51.1% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 48.9% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
25 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert