← Search

Katie Belvin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richardson, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 61W–21L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history82 matches
L
2026-11-03 · Team 23 Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mollie Romness
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-25 · Team 23 Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyla Obert
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-27 · Canyon Creek/Leary W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kerrie Davis
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-28 · Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mollie Romness
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mollie Romness
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-07 · Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0T · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kerrie Davis
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-09-28 · Canyon Creek/Gooch W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mollie Romness
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-02-27 · Canyon Creek/Kramer-Thomas W4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Thomas
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-01-31 · Canyon Creek/Kramer-Thomas W4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mollie Romness
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-01-24 · Canyon Creek/Kramer-Thomas W4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Bates
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
L
2024-06-22 · Canyon Creek/Gonzalez W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mollie Romness
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2024-06-20 · Canyon Creek/Kramer-Thomas W4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mollie Romness
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 78.9% of games
3.5
84.4%
27W–5L · 62% of games
4.0
64.9%
24W–13L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 65.5% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova