← Search

Brandon Wright

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 81W–47L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history128 matches
L
2026-04-09 · RMarks/KMahalingam (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Bartholomew
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
Default
2026-04-07 · RMarks (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ricky Marks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-02 · RMarks/KMahalingam (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirk Olsen
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-17 · RMarks (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Bartholomew
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2024-06-20 · JGriset (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-17 · MShea (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-11 · MShea (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katy Hart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-06-06 · JGriset (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Peterson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2024-05-30 · JGriset (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2024-05-21 · MShea (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2024-04-16 · RMarks (Blakeney) · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-04-02 · RMarks (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ricky Marks
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
62.2%
23W–14L · 55.7% of games
4.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 54% of games
7.5
90.5%
19W–2L · 63.5% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.5% of games
7.0mixed
72%
18W–7L · 60.6% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
7W–14L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#1 Singles
8%
10 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams