← Search

Anne Schaefer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Glen Burnie, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
233 matches · 126W–107L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history233 matches
L
2026-10-11 · Martin 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Seamancrawford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-10-08 · Griffith/Hoffman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle O'Brien
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-10-05 · Zimet - Mid-Court Crisis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nina Salomon
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-30 · Griffith/Hoffman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Oneill
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-24 · Zimet - Mid-Court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Zimet
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-10 · Griffith/Hoffman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mala Filippell
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-09 · Zimet - Mid-Court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Matney
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Huntington championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yulin Henry championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-28 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yulin Henry championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-23 · Racq Pack · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Randall Henigin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-09 · Racq Pack · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Randall Henigin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
46.3%
57W–66L · 47.6% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
40%
2W–3L · 48.9% of games
6.0
69.4%
25W–11L · 60.3% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
42W–21L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
79 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
51 matches
#1 Singles
4%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams