← Search

Kimberly Caison

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Walnut Creek, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 62W–55L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history117 matches
W
2026-04-08 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW7.0B · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Baioni
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-03-22 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW7.0B · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Miwon Vella
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-13 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18MX7.0C · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Bennett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-10 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Minh Cannon
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-02-21 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nga Gross
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-02-19 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nga Gross
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-02-03 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18MX7.0C · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Vella mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-02 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nga Gross
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-24 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18MX7.0C · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Snyder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-10 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lani Aurelius
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-05-17 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW8.0B · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Traci Krueger
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-04 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW8.0B · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Helen Bae
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
65.6%
21W–11L · 52.5% of games
4.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 44.9% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
70%
14W–6L · 61.2% of games
7.5
25%
2W–6L · 46.8% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 46.9% of games
7.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 49.3% of games
8.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
30 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams