← Search

Ethan Yung

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pittsford, NY
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 9W–9L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history18 matches
L
2025-03-23 · Crandall · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Elizaveta Letoshko mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-28 · Crandall · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Elena Vahl mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-11-02 · Cameron/Pruner · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vimal Seshadri Raguraman
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2024-06-30 · BUF: Wilbon · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2024-06-17 · BUF: Wilbon · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-06-10 · BUF: Wilbon · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-12-09 · ROC: Cameron/Pruner · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nathan Allen
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2023-12-03 · ROC: Cameron/Pruner · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zachary Shilvock
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2023-10-29 · ROC: Cameron/Pruner · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Khai Du
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-10-22 · ROC: Cameron/Pruner · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nathan Allen
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2023-09-30 · ROC: Cameron/Pruner · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nathan Allen
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-07-24 · Western: Rochester-Buffalo Coalition of Players · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 53.5% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 30.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#2 Singles
22%
4 matches
#1 Singles
17%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams