← Search

Christina Rush

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
183 matches · 134W–49L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history183 matches
W
2026-10-13 · Smith 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brittany Furr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-09-29 · Smith 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brittany Furr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-26 · Smith 40s 8.5W Combo Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stephanie Bettinger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Smith championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Smith championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-08 · Smith 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Heather Parr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-09-04 · Smith 40s 8.5W Combo Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leslie Marus
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-25 · Smith 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Dunning
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-17 · Smith 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christina Campbell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-13 · Smith 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Heather Parr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-03 · Piedmont 40s 4.5 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chuck Burns mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-05 · Danford 18s TriLevel 5.0/4.5/4.0W Sunday · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Smith
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
100%
7W–0L · 69.7% of games
4.0
77.4%
48W–14L · 62.3% of games
4.5
67.7%
21W–10L · 56.8% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
86.4%
19W–3L · 66.1% of games
8.5
67.3%
35W–17L · 58.8% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
45 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe