← Search

Marybeth Dattilio

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Etna, NH
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 12W–8L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history20 matches
W
2023-12-20 · OC:Siegel · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lori Siegel
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-11-19 · MTS:Luneau:Harrington · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sandra Harrington
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2023-11-16 · OC:Siegel · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathy Schellong
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2023-10-22 · MTS:Luneau:Harrington · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathy Farrell
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2023-10-01 · MTS:Luneau:Harrington · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sandra Harrington
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2022-11-20 · RVC:Siegel:Joslin-King · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Debra Williamson
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2022-11-20 · RVC:Siegel:Joslin-King · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Deborah Panzica
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2022-03-27 · B:RVC:Grotz · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alexander Bryant mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-03-20 · B:RVC:Grotz · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Radu Stan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2020-01-25 · Ashare:Datillo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ali Ashare
loading the estimate
9-7
W
2020-01-25 · Ashare:Datillo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ali Ashare
loading the estimate
8-2
W
2019-12-08 · Ashare:Datillo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Robbins
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.7% of games
4.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 60% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 65% of the time
#1 Doubles
65%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe