← Search

Sandra Anderson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naples, FL
2.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 15W–12L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history27 matches
W
2025-02-14 · Flight Winners /sterling Oaks / Bergstrom · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Feldman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-11-18 · sterling Oaks - Bergstrom · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Feldman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
2024-11-01 · sterling Oaks - Bergstrom · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Feldman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-10-18 · sterling Oaks - Bergstrom · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Bergstrom
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-29 · Sterling Oaks - Bergstrom · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Bergstrom
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
L
2024-01-26 · Sterling Oaks - Bergstrom · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeri Carley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2023-11-03 · Sterling Oaks - Bergstrom · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Bergstrom
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2023-02-10 · Sterling Oaks - Bergstrom · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Weinman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
W
2022-11-11 · Sterling Oaks - Bergstrom · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Pauls
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2022-10-28 · Sterling Oaks - Bergstrom · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with DEBORAH Eck
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
2022-10-21 · Sterling Oaks - Bergstrom · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Feldman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-03-05 · Sterling Oaks - S. Bergstrom · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Sanders
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.9% of games
6.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 53.9% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer