← Search

Meg Brown

— year-end
25 matches · 10W–15L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Meg Brown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
L
2026-04-20 · Parks/Knoxville · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krista McIntosh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-06 · Parks/Knoxville · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-02 · Parks/Knoxville · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Cantrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-19 · McKeehan’s-Christen/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-11-23 · Christen-McKeehan/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Rehn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2024-10-26 · Christen-McKeehan/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-09-14 · Brown/Morgan · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Catherine Schiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-04-16 · GomesStallingsBarton/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Fendley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2024-04-15 · BrownMorgan/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffany Barton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-03-25 · BrownMorgan/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Rehn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-03-22 · GomesStallingsBarton/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Thurman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-03-02 · CampEagen/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Thurman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 48.2% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
16%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert