← Search

Natalie von Allmen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hickory, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
303 matches · 194W–109L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history303 matches
W
2026-10-13 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aleshia Abernathy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-14 · vonAllmen/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kate Gnida
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-03 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Miller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-02 · vonAllmen/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Salem Wood
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-24 · vonAllmen/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kate Gnida
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-08-22 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aleshia Abernathy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-18 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aleshia Abernathy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Abernathy/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Everley
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · Abernathy/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Fisher
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-14 · Abernathy/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Moore
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-02 · Abernathy/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Everley
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-04-30 · vonAllmen/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Everley
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 59.8% of games
2.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 56.7% of games
3.0
59.3%
86W–59L · 53.4% of games
3.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 49.7% of games
5.0
90%
9W–1L · 68.5% of games
5.5
71.2%
37W–15L · 59.7% of games
6.5
68.6%
24W–11L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
120 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
94 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
79 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer