← Search

Aleshia Abernathy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hickory, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
338 matches · 193W–145L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history338 matches
W
2026-10-14 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-10-13 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie von Allmen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-08 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carissa Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-07 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mindy Murray
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-10-05 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Taylor Austin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-09-24 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarita Black
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
Default
2026-09-22 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarita Black
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-10 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Moore
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-09 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-02 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samantha Austin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-08-22 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie von Allmen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-18 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie von Allmen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
48%
12W–13L · 49.3% of games
2.5
67.7%
21W–10L · 60.3% of games
3.0
59.3%
80W–55L · 55.2% of games
3.5
48.9%
23W–24L · 49.3% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 49.4% of games
5.5
63.9%
23W–13L · 56.3% of games
6.5
61.8%
21W–13L · 52.1% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
139 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
78 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
17 matches
#1 Singles
3%
10 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer