← Search

Meghan Eichelberger

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
193 matches · 128W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history193 matches
W
2026-10-29 · LCTA18/Eichelberger/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Johnson
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-1
W
2026-10-22 · LCTA18/Eichelberger/Hamlin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Richardson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
Default
2026-10-01 · LCTA18/Eichelberger/Hamlin · #2 Singles · 3.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-11-24 · LCTA18/Kopanski/Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mindy Spring
loading the estimate
4-4
L
2025-11-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Richardson
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-30 · LCTA18/Kopanski/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Chapman
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Richardson
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-24 · LCTA18/Kopanski/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimber Wiggins
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-23 · LCTA18/Kopanski/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Richardson
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimber Wiggins
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Ryan
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-10-16 · LCTA18/Kopanski/Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Caroline Hurren
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
83.3%
45W–9L · 66.4% of games
3.5
58.9%
53W–37L · 53.2% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.9% of games
5.5
75%
6W–2L · 60.6% of games
6.5
69.6%
16W–7L · 58.4% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.2% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
98 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
26 matches
#1 Singles
5%
9 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal