← Search

Rachel Brown

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
198 matches · 133W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history198 matches
W
2026-10-07 · Cr.Smith18C7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Easley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-09-29 · TOC.Cronin · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samantha Cronin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-15 · Cr.Smith18C7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Monsees
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-09 · Cr.Smith18C7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Easley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-01 · TOC.Cronin · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Taylor Anthony
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-31 · Cr.Smith18C7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brooke Abee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-25 · TOC.Cronin · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samantha Cronin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-11 · TOC.Cronin · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Slater
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · TOC.Cronin · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samantha Cronin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-03 · Ra.Brown18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sterling Thomas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
Default
2026-07-27 · Ra.Brown18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sterling Thomas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-08 · Ti.Barrier18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Saitta
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 51.4% of games
3.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 65.1% of games
3.5
76.9%
30W–9L · 58.5% of games
4.0
47.8%
11W–12L · 49% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
77.1%
27W–8L · 57.8% of games
7.5
68%
17W–8L · 51.2% of games
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.1% of games
4.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 58% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
34 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova