← Search

Emily Larson

— year-end
42 matches · 36W–6L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Emily Larson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-09-04 · Je.Holloman40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with KATRINA SIZEMORE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-03 · TOC.Meeker · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberlie Meeker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-31 · Sh.Agresta18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christina Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-21 · Je.Holloman40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jane Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-20 · He.Tuttle40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Holly Gyovai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-14 · Je.Holloman40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christina Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-16 · Li.Kempf18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-11 · TOC.Meeker · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Suzanne Wagner / Kim Johnson
2026-06-09 · Li.Kempf18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-07 · Ki.Meeker40T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · Li.Kempf18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · Ki.Meeker40T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Ravenscraft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
Teams49 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
93.3%
14W–1L · 71.5% of games
4.0
75%
15W–5L · 56.6% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 82.8% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer