← Search

Rowland Morgan

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 38W–28L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Rowland Morgan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
W
2025-02-14 · NTC-Morgan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colin Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-01-26 · NTC-Morgan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-17 · NTC-String Theory 55-Morgan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Dunnington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-11-03 · NTC-String Theory 55-Morgan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-02-24 · NTC-String Theory-Burns · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-01-28 · NTC-String Theory-Burns · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Dunnington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2024-01-14 · NTC-String Theory-Burns · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Jacobsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-06 · NTC-String Theory-Burns · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Jacobsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2023-10-01 · NTC-String Theory-Burns · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2023-09-24 · NTC-String Theory-Burns · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Jacobsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-03-17 · NTC-String Theory-Burns · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Dunnington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2023-03-03 · NTC-String Theory-Burns · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Dunnington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
58.3%
28W–20L · 52.7% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.5% of games
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
25 matches
#1 Singles
14%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams