Search

Rowland Morgan

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
66 matches · 38W–28L · seasons 20192025
Where Rowland sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Rowland is one of 1159 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 59% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rowland has been a steady 3.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Rowland has gone from the 56th to the 50th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
58.3%
28W–20L · 52.7% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.5% of games
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history66 matches
W
Nicholas Maddock / Julian Weber
2025-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colin Williams
0.005about as expected — took 56% of games against 57% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-01-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Burns
0.020below expectation — took 50% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Dunnington
+0.005about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-11-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Burns
+0.014better than expected — took 63% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-02-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Cobb
+0.003better than expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Aron Choi / Chuong Nguyen
2024-01-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Dunnington
+0.013better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2024-01-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Jacobsen
0.027below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-01-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Jacobsen
+0.010about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2023-10-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Cobb
+0.016better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2023-09-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Jacobsen
+0.004about as expected — took 47% of games against 47% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-03-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Dunnington
+0.005about as expected — took 44% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
Henry Kiner / Julian Weber
2023-03-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Dunnington
0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.