← Search

Heather Duke

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Shreveport, LA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
164 matches · 80W–84L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history164 matches
L
2026-10-07 · Silvio-Stafford/40/6.5/CWN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dana Hicks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-23 · Silvio-Stafford/40/6.5/CWN/POTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jenifer Doege
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-16 · Silvio-Stafford/40/6.5/CWN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dana Hicks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-13 · Stratton/18/3-3.5-4/TWN/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary-Frances Haynes championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-12 · Stratton/18/3-3.5-4/TWN/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary-Frances Haynes championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · Silvio-Stafford/40/6.5/CWN/POTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathryn Wood
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-15 · Stratton/18/3-3.5-4/TWN/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Betsy Phillips
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-02 · Garcia-Griffin/18/3.0/MXD/QTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nishyant Jani mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-1
L
2026-05-06 · McCoy/40/3.5/MXD/POTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robbie Malone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · Pitman-Cummer/55/3.0/WD/POTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marjorie Briley championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-24 · Pitman-Cummer/55/3.0/WD/POTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marjorie Briley championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · Garcia-Griffin/18/3.0/MXD/QTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Garcia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
60.8%
48W–31L · 53.9% of games
3.5
18.2%
4W–18L · 40.7% of games
5.5
90%
9W–1L · 65.7% of games
6.5
25%
6W–18L · 42.8% of games
3.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 48.6% of games
3.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 39.2% of games
6.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 56.7% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
50 matches
#1 Singles
23%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
33 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe