← Search

Robbie Malone

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Shreveport, LA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
225 matches · 121W–104L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history225 matches
L
2026-06-01 · McCoy/18/3.5/MXD/POTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elise McMahen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-27 · McCoy/18/3.5/MXD/POTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Arizmendi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-20 · McCoy/40/3.5/MXD/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with MLiss Sella mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-13 · McCoy/40/3.5/MXD/POTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Burgin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-06 · McCoy/40/3.5/MXD/POTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Duke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-15 · McCoy/40/3.5/MXD/POTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Arizmendi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-08 · McCoy/40/3.5/MXD/POTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Hicks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-07 · McCoy/18/3.5/MXD/POTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elise McMahen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-26 · Wolf-Armstrong/40/3.5/M/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Barrow
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-02-26 · Wolf-Armstrong/40/3.5/M/POTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kris Jackson
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-19 · Wolf-Armstrong/40/3.5/M/POTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Phillips
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-12 · Wolf-Armstrong/40/3.5/M/POTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dhu Thompson
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
61.6%
45W–28L · 52.3% of games
3.5
36.1%
13W–23L · 43% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 55.7% of games
6.5
52.9%
18W–16L · 52.4% of games
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 59% of games
3.5mixed
30%
6W–14L · 41.3% of games
6.0mixed
69%
20W–9L · 57.7% of games
7.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
84 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
67 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer