← Search

Tim Stuart

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Shreveport, LA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
227 matches · 165W–62L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history227 matches
W
2026-10-20 · Stuart/18/6.5/CM/BTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rahul Shah
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-12 · Stanton/18/7.5/CM/POTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jason Rogers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-05 · Stanton/18/7.5/CM/POTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jason Rogers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-10-05 · Stanton/18/7.5/CM/POTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jason Rogers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-29 · Stuart/18/6.5/CM/BTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Richard Morgan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-22 · Stuart/18/6.5/CM/BTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Sutton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-16 · Stuart/40/6.5/CM/BTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matt Chandler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-15 · Stuart/18/6.5/CM/BTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Isaac Thomas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karyn Triche mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Singletary mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-12 · Stuart/40/6.5/CM/BTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Sutton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-23 · Stuart/40/3-3.5-4/TM/POTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kris Jackson
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 65.8% of games
3.0
90.3%
28W–3L · 69.1% of games
3.5
70.2%
40W–17L · 57.1% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.2% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
88%
22W–3L · 71.7% of games
6.5
68%
17W–8L · 56.2% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.3% of games
2.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games
3.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 59.9% of games
3.5mixed
72%
18W–7L · 59.5% of games
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 31% of games
6.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 60.8% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 61% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
72 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams