← Search

Natalie Despinoy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
— year-end
7 matches · 4W–3L · seasons 2019–2019
Match history7 matches
W
2019-08-29 · CIN Indianapolis, Doubles 3.0, Gordon (IRC-D) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Gordon
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2019-07-23 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 3.0 W, Fritz (BCC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annette Moore
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2019-07-11 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 2.5 W, Fritz (BCC) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stacy Dawkins
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2019-06-27 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 2.5 W, Fritz (BCC) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with JoAnne Whelan
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2019-06-20 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 2.5 W, Fritz (BCC) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Laurel Burns
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2019-06-06 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 2.5 W, Fritz (BCC) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jody Davis
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2019-05-29 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 2.5 W, Fritz (BCC) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Julie Leimgruber
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Teams3 teams · 2019–2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 47.4% of games
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer