← Search

Kim Sims

— year-end
44 matches · 36W–8L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Kim Sims to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
L
2026-07-09 · Pace, Phillip · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Moseley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · Pace, Phillip · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Moseley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-11 · Pace, Phillip · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Moseley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · Pace, Phillip · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Moseley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-16 · Galey, Amanda · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Boston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-19 · Galey, Amanda · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Boston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-26 · Galey, Amanda · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Sing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-12-12 · Castle, Mandy · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-11-09 · Castle, Mandy · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-09-29 · Do, Jennifer · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Do
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-09-15 · Do, Jennifer · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Do
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-08-25 · Do, Jennifer · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley Stroud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
86.4%
19W–3L · 69.1% of games
7.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 67.1% of games
3.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 59.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#3 Singles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova