← Search

Jessica Bynum

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Brandywine, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
472 matches · 339W–133L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history472 matches
L
2026-10-31 · B&V · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Phat Bui mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-30 · LoVV · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anjali Garg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-10-28 · The Vicious Vollies · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dannielle Freeman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-10-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Felicia Harrison championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Skeeta Narciss championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dannielle Freeman championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dannielle Freeman championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-10-14 · The Vicious Vollies · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dannielle Freeman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-6
L
2026-10-04 · The Vicious Vollies · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jocelyn Bolt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-09 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Avraham Amram mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-30 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit DC Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Skeeta Narciss
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-29 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit DC Tri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dannielle Freeman
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams97 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level19 levels played
2.5
75%
9W–3L · 58.6% of games
3.0
82.6%
19W–4L · 64.8% of games
3.5
93.1%
27W–2L · 68.5% of games
4.0
75.5%
117W–38L · 60% of games
4.5
35%
7W–13L · 43.1% of games
6.5
100%
11W–0L · 68.5% of games
7.5
75.9%
41W–13L · 59.4% of games
8.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.7% of games
2.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 57.3% of games
4.0mixed
81.2%
13W–3L · 60.8% of games
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 60% of games
6.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.7% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
18W–15L · 54.7% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
16W–8L · 53.7% of games
8.0mixed
63.8%
30W–17L · 54.9% of games
8.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.3% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
215 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
154 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
67 matches
#1 Singles
4%
17 matches
#2 Singles
3%
14 matches
#3 Singles
1%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova