← Search

Kevin Shuler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
222 matches · 110W–112L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history222 matches
L
2026-10-20 · LCTA39/Lee/MPR · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dennis Rossello
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-19 · LCTA18/Cooke-Harrison/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wilson Crouch
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-10-12 · LCTA18/Cooke-Harrison/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Murray
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-10-07 · LCTA39/Harrison-Cooke/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Cline
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-10-06 · LCTA39/Lee/MPR · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Wichmann
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-30 · LCTA39/Harrison-Cooke/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Sakre
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-09-28 · LCTA18/Cooke-Harrison/MPR · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-23 · LCTA39/Harrison-Cooke/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Murray
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-22 · LCTA39/Lee/MPR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ansel Kay
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-08 · LCTA18/Kornahrens/MPR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mitchell Zintel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-31 · LCTA40/Cladakis/MPR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Hauser
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · LCTA18/Kornahrens/MPR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mitchell Zintel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 66.9% of games
3.5
47.9%
67W–73L · 49.2% of games
4.0
25%
2W–6L · 42.4% of games
6.5
50%
22W–22L · 49.2% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 45% of games
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
89 matches
#1 Singles
20%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
29 matches
#2 Singles
7%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams