← Search

Christopher Greeno

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Daniel Island, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
212 matches · 145W–67L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history212 matches
W
2026-10-29 · LCTA39/Greeno/DIC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Derek Miller
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-10-27 · LCTA39/Williams/DIC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Roth
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-25 · LCTA39/Williams/DIC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Roth
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nick Cladakis championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nick Cladakis championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-21 · LCTA39/Greeno/DIC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with J Stier
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-20 · LCTA39/Williams/DIC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Williams
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-14 · LCTA39/Greeno/DIC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Mabry
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-13 · LCTA39/Williams/DIC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Williams
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-10-12 · LCTA18/Fox-Fennel/LTP-DI · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Park
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-10-06 · LCTA39/Williams/DIC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Lusardi
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-30 · LCTA39/Greeno/DIC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with J Stier
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
81%
34W–8L · 60.8% of games
3.5
65.3%
47W–25L · 56.9% of games
4.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 47.9% of games
6.5
71.8%
28W–11L · 59.3% of games
7.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 53% of games
3.5mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 56.6% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
47 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams