← Search

Joe Williams

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 43W–55L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history98 matches
W
2026-10-25 · LCTA39/Williams/DIC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Stack
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-20 · LCTA39/Williams/DIC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Greeno
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-13 · LCTA39/Williams/DIC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Greeno
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-10-06 · LCTA39/Williams/DIC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Gross
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · LCTA18/Little/DIC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Leahy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · LCTA18/Little/DIC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Leahy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-19 · LCTA18/Little/DIC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Leahy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-03-24 · LCTA40/Williams/DIC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Lusardi
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-17 · LCTA40/Williams/DIC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Miller
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-03 · LCTA40/Williams/DIC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Finley
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-24 · LCTA40/Williams/DIC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Carroll
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-17 · LCTA40/Williams/DIC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Lusardi
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 54.8% of games
4.0
33.3%
16W–32L · 44.9% of games
6.5
70%
7W–3L · 55.9% of games
7.5
40%
4W–6L · 45.1% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 40.9% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
26 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King