← Search

Ryan Zimmerman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 117W–41L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history158 matches
W
2026-10-27 · LCTA39/Tunick/ParkWest · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Coyle
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-10-20 · LCTA39/Tunick/ParkWest · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-13 · LCTA39/Tunick/ParkWest · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-06 · LCTA39/Tunick/ParkWest · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Smith
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-01 · LCTA39/Tunick/ParkWest · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Smith
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-09-29 · LCTA39/Tunick/ParkWest · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Smith
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-24 · LCTA40/Tunick/ParkWest · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doug Gerard
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-17 · LCTA40/Tunick/ParkWest · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Witte
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-10 · LCTA40/Tunick/ParkWest · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Witte
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-03 · LCTA40/Tunick/ParkWest · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Fischer
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-26 · LCTA40/Tunick/ParkWest · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Witte
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-24 · LCTA40/Tunick/ParkWest · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Witte
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
100%
10W–0L · 67.6% of games
3.5
84.2%
32W–6L · 65.2% of games
4.0
47.9%
23W–25L · 49.7% of games
6.5
93.3%
14W–1L · 64.3% of games
7.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 61.1% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.3% of games
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 78.7% of games
7.0mixed
100%
19W–0L · 70.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
44 matches
#1 Singles
14%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
22 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova