← Search

Deanna Bayless

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lakeland, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 7W–24L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history31 matches
L
2026-05-12 · Lakeland Country Club/ Campisi · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bevin Strickland
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-03 · Lakeland Country Club - C. Phillips · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Campisi
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-10 · Lakeland Country Club - C. Phillips · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Hollis
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-20 · Lakeland Country Club - C. Phillips · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-13 · Lakeland Country Club - C. Phillips · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hilary Crenshaw
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-23 · The Lakeland CC 3.0 - C. Phillips · #5 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Hilary Crenshaw
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-06-12 · Lakeland - B. Lansford · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lizette Murphy
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-4
L
2025-04-22 · Lakeland CC - Grieger/Evans · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Mcwilliams
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-11 · Lakeland CC - Grieger/Evans · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hilary Crenshaw
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-03-05 · Polk/PaulCrenshaw/18&Over3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hilary Crenshaw
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-11-05 · LCC - E. Paul · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Bevin Strickland
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
W
2024-08-20 · LCC - E. Paul · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Carey Campbell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 28.6% of games
3.0
18.2%
4W–18L · 38.5% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#3 Female Doubles
10%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
2 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer