← Search

Jason Ingber

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
West Bloomfield, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 49W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history91 matches
W
2026-07-29 · HAWK-Williamson 55s 8.0M F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Freeman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · NAC-Taylor 40s 4.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Williamson
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · HAWK-Williamson 55s 8.0M F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Shanks
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-07 · DTC-Richardson 18s 4.0M F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Williamson
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · NAC-Taylor 40s 4.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Mayoras
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-17 · HAWK-Williamson 55s 8.0M F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Richardson
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-16 · DTC-Richardson 18s 4.0M F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Murav
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-05 · DTC-Parker 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robin Parker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-27 · HAWK-Williamson 55s 8.0M F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Richardson
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-21 · NAC-Taylor 40s 4.0M F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Richardson
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-08-06 · 2HAWK-WILLIAMSON 80M WE 55&O SEM · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Nellett
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-30 · 2HAWK-WILLIAMSON 80M WE 55&O SEM · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Richardson
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
68.9%
31W–14L · 56.1% of games
4.0
46.2%
12W–14L · 45.9% of games
8.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 42.7% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#1 Singles
12%
11 matches
#2 Singles
8%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova