← Search

Jennifer Martz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hillsborough, NJ
4.0A year-end 2023
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
100 matches · 53W–47L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history100 matches
L
2025-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tony Ferrante mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-12-07 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tyler Harris mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-08-22 · Nassau 2 · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-08-13 · Nassau 2 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jill Bacso
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-07-30 · Nassau 2 · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2023-07-23 · Nassau 2 · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2023-07-16 · Nassau 2 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dina Luther
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2023-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Khalev mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jon Rubinstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2023-04-08 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Khalev mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
W
2023-04-01 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Allan Orchard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2023-03-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Hudec mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
70%
7W–3L · 61.1% of games
4.5
50%
4W–4L · 44.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.3% of games
8.0mixed
56.8%
25W–19L · 52.3% of games
9.0mixed
40.7%
11W–16L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams