← Search

Sarah Nickoson

Weston, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
268 matches · 107W–161L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah Nickoson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history268 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Woodmont/Morato · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with RENEE ALEXIS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-24 · Veltri/Wank · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maria Monserratte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · Woodmont/Morato · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lidia Luz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-07 · Woodmont/Morato · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yun Lu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-05 · Veltri/Wank · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maria Monserratte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-13 · Woodmont/Morato · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lidia Luz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-08 · Veltri/Wank · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maria Monserratte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-15 · C/Piccolo/Nickoson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dominique Jean-Baptiste
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · Veltri/Nickoson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Reece
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · C/Piccolo/Nickoson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Reece
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · C/Piccolo/Nickoson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Mariani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-06-04 · Veltri/Nickoson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Reece
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 50% of games
3.5
52.6%
10W–9L · 52% of games
4.0
35.1%
54W–100L · 46.5% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
52.2%
24W–22L · 49.8% of games
8.0
25%
2W–6L · 43.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
14.3%
2W–12L · 37.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
110 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
65 matches
#2 Singles
3%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe