← Search

Heloisa Faria

Weston, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
169 matches · 117W–52L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Heloisa Faria to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history169 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Perez (Miami Lakes Athletic Club) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Milka Vignali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-08 · Midtown/Park · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lidamari Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-28 · Midtown/Craig · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maritza Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-25 · Midtown/Park · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rosie Levy-Harf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · Veltri/Wank · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maria Suarez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-14 · Midtown/Craig · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rosie Levy-Harf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · WestonHills/Mei/Coluccio · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marioly Fiandor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · WestonHills/Mei/Coluccio · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marioly Fiandor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-31 · Midtown/Craig · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rosie Levy-Harf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-14 · Midtown/Park · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rosane Villordo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-02 · Midtown/Correa/Vignali · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tae Park mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Milka Vignali championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
71.1%
32W–13L · 59% of games
3.5
68.1%
47W–22L · 58.5% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 63.2% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
10 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer