← Search

Eric Price

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
HANOVER, MD
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 81W–77L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history158 matches
L
2026-07-25 · Toro - Net Success 40+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jorge Paucar
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-23 · Toro - Net Success 40+ 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Djajaputra
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-14 · Toro - Net Success 40+ 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Vilk
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-08 · Atom Smashers 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with George Sybert
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Default
2026-06-30 · Toro - Net Success 40+ 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jose Toro
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-26 · Toro - Net Success 40+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Custer
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-25 · Atom Smashers 40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Stickels
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · Toro - Net Success 40+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Vilk
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-18 · Atom Smashers 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Smith
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-15 · Toro - Net Success 40+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Djajaputra
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-10 · Toro - Net Success 40+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ateeq Ahmed
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-04 · Hester · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Mason
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
83.7%
41W–8L · 65% of games
3.5
37.1%
36W–61L · 42.3% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
60 matches
#2 Singles
21%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
18 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams