← Search

Dawn Parker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Zionsville, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 40W–41L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history81 matches
L
2026-08-13 · Indy A55 7.0W E BRE McNamar · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Mingus
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-30 · Indy A55 7.0W E BRE McNamar · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Mingus
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-23 · Indy A55 7.0W E BRE McNamar · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Mingus
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · Indy A40 3.5W PATC Fleenor · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Schumm
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-09 · Indy A55 7.0W E BRE McNamar · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa Berg
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · Indy A40 3.5W PATC Fleenor · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Schumm
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Indy A55 7.0W E BRE McNamar · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa Berg
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Indy A55 7.0W E BRE McNamar · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Mingus
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · Indy A55 7.0W E BRE McNamar · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Mingus
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-01 · Indy A40 3.5W PATC Fleenor · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Armington
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
Default
2026-05-03 · Indy 7.5W SAT PATC Ackerman · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Adrienne Snoddy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-25 · Indy 7.5W SAT PATC Ackerman · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Adrienne Snoddy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.6% of games
3.5
70.4%
19W–8L · 57.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 33% of games
6.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 40.7% of games
7.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.9% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 49.4% of games
6.5mixed
60%
6W–4L · 50.5% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert