← Search

Chris Roach

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dallas, TX
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 14W–19L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history33 matches
L
2024-10-27 · Royal Oaks/Treacy M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Everett
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-09-22 · Royal Oaks/Treacy M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc Katz
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-23 · Royal Oaks/Treacy M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eivind Olsen
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-02-24 · Royal Oaks/Treacy M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenyon Arens
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2024-02-17 · Royal Oaks/Treacy M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Carter
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-06-26 · Royal Oaks/Galvan M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Seals
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-06-11 · Royal Oaks/Galvan M3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-05-21 · Royal Oaks/Galvan M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Seals
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2023-04-24 · Royal Oaks/Galvan M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trey Whatley
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-03-19 · Royal Oaks/Galvan M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Mason
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2022-01-29 · Royal Oaks/Galvan M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Snoddy
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2021-10-16 · ROCC/Galvan M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenyon Arens
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
45.2%
14W–17L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams