← Search

Burk Heroman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baton Rouge, LA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
305 matches · 153W–152L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history305 matches
W
2026-10-11 · Braud/55/6.5/CM/SOAC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stewart Guerin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-09-29 · Braud/40/6.5/CM/SOAC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kenny Burns
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-30 · Braud/55/6.5/CM/SOAC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stewart Guerin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-25 · Braud/40/6.5/CM/SOAC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stewart Guerin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-23 · Braud/55/6.5/CM/SOAC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stewart Guerin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-28 · Heroman/40/3.5/MD/SOAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gretchen McCurley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · BRAUD/55/3.5/MD/SOAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Hines mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-14 · Heroman/40/3.5/MD/SOAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gretchen McCurley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · BRAUD/55/3.5/MD/SOAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Hines mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · BRAUD/55/3.5/MD/SOAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Hines mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · Chapman/18/3.5/M/SOAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colin Hughes championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-05 · Chapman/18/3.5/M/SOAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ali Momenzadeh championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams88 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
59%
36W–25L · 56% of games
3.5
31%
27W–60L · 43.1% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 39.4% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
56.8%
42W–32L · 52.6% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 49.4% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
69%
20W–9L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
80%
16W–4L · 58% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
127 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
79 matches
#1 Singles
3%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams