← Search

Denise Wolf

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
JUPITER, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 41W–45L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history86 matches
L
Katherine Nook / Galena Miller-Horii
2025-10-26 · BC-MiraCosta/PamelaHayes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Juli Vadney
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-07 · BC-MiraCosta/PamelaHayes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with LISA MANCE
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-04-27 · BC-MiraCosta/PamHayes(formerlyTsukasa) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Ecker
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-04-06 · BC-MiraCosta/PamHayes(formerlyTsukasa) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Ecker
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-02-16 · BC-MCC/RachelAlexander · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Tinker
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-02-08 · BC-MCC/RachelAlexander · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Alexander
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-11-17 · BC-MCC/RachelAlexander · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Alexander
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-10-13 · BC-MCC/RachelAlexander · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Thompson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-09-08 · BC-MCC/RachelAlexander · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Alexander
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-08-18 · BC-MCC/ChristineBucklin · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Alexander
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2024-06-29 · BC-MCC/RachelAlexander · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Tinker
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2024-06-23 · BC-MCC/RachelAlexander · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Twombley
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 55% of games
4.0
38.2%
21W–34L · 46% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 51.2% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova