← Search

Elizabeth Coleman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
297 matches · 173W–124L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history297 matches
L
2026-10-25 · ACAC Davis Racket Rebels 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Knudson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-24 · ACAC Mixed up Jonesie 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Daryl Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-23 · ACAC Mixed up Jonesie 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Daryl Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-03 · ACAC Davis Racket Rebels 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Blackburn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-24 · ACAC Lewis · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · ACAC Lewis 7.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Darlene Moehling
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-03 · ACAC Krebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Wong
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-30 · ACAC Lewis 7.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Darlene Moehling
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-08-18 · ACAC Krebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashlyn DesMarteau
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-24 · ACAC Davis Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eddie Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · ACAC Fabulous 40+ Ladies - Schuetzinger · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Monger
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · ACAC Krebs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tatiana Smirnov
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams83 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level15 levels played
2.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 72.2% of games
3.0
65.9%
29W–15L · 60.5% of games
3.5
51.5%
34W–32L · 52.2% of games
4.0
50%
4W–4L · 49.2% of games
5.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 64.5% of games
6.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 59.1% of games
7.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 54% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 66.7% of games
6.5mixed
53.8%
14W–12L · 54.5% of games
7.0mixed
46.5%
20W–23L · 48.8% of games
7.5mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 41.8% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
93 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
74 matches
#2 Singles
8%
24 matches
#1 Singles
7%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams