← Search

Bety Miranda

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
High Point, NC
5.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 93W–27L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-05-31 · Medel 18s TriLevel 5.0/4.5/4.0 Sunday · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Tiffany Vanhpraseuth
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-16 · Speight 18s 5.0W Sun PM · #1 Singles · 5.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-09 · Speight 18s 5.0W Sun PM · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Tiffany Vanhpraseuth
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-19 · Speight 18s 5.0W Sun PM · #1 Singles · 5.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-15 · Speight 18s 5.0W Sun PM · #1 Singles · 5.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-11-15 · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Thanawan Hahn championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-11-14 · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Denise Speight championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-08 · Medel 18+ Tri 5.0/4.5/4.0W Sunday · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jamie Breunig
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-01 · Medel 18+ Tri 5.0/4.5/4.0W Sunday · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jamie Breunig
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
Tiffany Brown / Lauren Nutt
2024-10-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Beth Bell championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-10-04 · Alvarino/Churchill 40s 8.5 Combo W Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Beth Bell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-09-27 · Alvarino/Churchill 40s 8.5 Combo W Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jessica Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
4.0
100%
4W–0L · 77.4% of games
4.5
86.7%
39W–6L · 67.2% of games
5.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.9% of games
8.5
87%
40W–6L · 62.9% of games
9.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 63.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
25 matches
#1 Singles
18%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
14 matches
#2 Singles
9%
11 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams