← Search

Cheryl Tolentino

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Apopka, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 123W–95L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history218 matches
L
2026-10-19 · USTA Campus-Mishoe · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Sipio
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-02 · Waterford-Driggers Slice · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Bushey
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-13 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kathleen Sipio
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-09-13 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kathleen Sipio
loading the estimate
5-7
L
2026-05-22 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Sipio
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-15 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Konicki
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-11 · USTA Campus-Sipio · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Sipio
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-24 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Karen
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-20 · USTA Campus-Sipio · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Sipio
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-17 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Sipio
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-15 · USTA Campus-Sipio · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vanha Le
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-02 · USTA Campus-Sipio · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Sipio
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 59.1% of games
2.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 38.9% of games
3.0
76.7%
33W–10L · 62% of games
3.5
55.7%
59W–47L · 50.7% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 32.1% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 55.7% of games
7.5
20%
2W–8L · 42% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 24% of the time
#2 Doubles
24%
52 matches
#1 Singles
23%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
36 matches
Singles
8%
18 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert