← Search

Michelle Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Winter Park, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
222 matches · 137W–85L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history222 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Sanlando-Monge · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henry Fernandez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Default
2026-10-30 · Sanlando-Crane-Kick Ace · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelli Forgione
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-24 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaqueline Pelliccia championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-10-23 · Sanlando-Pelliccia-Fireballs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Baumgarten
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Baumgarten championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-10-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caitlyn Martino championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-10-19 · Sanlando-Pelliccia -Fireballs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Norvell
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-15 · Sanlando-Monge · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patty Villane
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-10-02 · Sanlando-Pelliccia-Fireballs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Baumgarten
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-28 · Sanlando-Pelliccia -Fireballs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with ROSANA MONTEIRO
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-21 · Sanlando-Monge · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patty Villane
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-09-18 · Sanlando-Crane-Kick Ace · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Richelle Hayes
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 54.9% of games
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 61.3% of games
3.5
62.3%
76W–46L · 56.7% of games
6.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 61.1% of games
7.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 60.3% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 64.6% of games
7.0mixed
47.1%
16W–18L · 53.7% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
49 matches
#2 Singles
5%
11 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert