← Search

Danielle Curwood

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Denver, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
361 matches · 215W–146L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history361 matches
W
2026-10-12 · LKLR-Riccardelli/Westport · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Karner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-09-28 · LKLR-Riccardelli/Westport · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leila Riccardelli
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-16 · LKBD-Dedmond/Westport · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennie Carruth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-10 · LKBD-Dedmond/Westport · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katelyn Goodnough
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · LKBD-Dedmond/Westport · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennie Carruth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-31 · LKLR-Riccardelli/Westport · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Helen Bugg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-09 · MLNKA-Kayton/CSD 4.0 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Laurenson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-30 · TLWKI-King/CSD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marilou Martin
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-29 · MLJFR-Franck/Westport · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Phillips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · MLKGO-Goodnough/Westport · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chip Ashley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · MLNKA-Kayton/CSD 4.0 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chip Ashley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · TLBDE-Dedmond/CSD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Clay
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams87 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
65.3%
47W–25L · 55.4% of games
3.5
54.4%
56W–47L · 53.8% of games
4.0
64%
16W–9L · 55.5% of games
5.5
69%
29W–13L · 58.9% of games
6.5
52.8%
19W–17L · 52.1% of games
7.5
35.7%
10W–18L · 45.5% of games
2.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 92.3% of games
3.5mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 56.1% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 34.8% of games
6.0mixed
77.8%
21W–6L · 60.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
165 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
107 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
66 matches
#1 Singles
4%
13 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert