← Search

DAVID ROBASKA

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Parkville, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
9 matches · 1W–8L · seasons 2023–2025
Match history9 matches
L
2025-03-29 · Smith, John · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Smith
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-08 · Smith, John · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Smith
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-01-11 · Smith, John · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Smith
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-02 · Smith, John · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Baker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-19 · Smith, John · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barry Waldron
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2024-04-28 · Smith, John · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Geiger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Stephen Lunsford / Brian Harris
2023-06-25 · Smith, John · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Baker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2023-06-11 · Smith, John · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Baker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-04 · Smith, John · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bond Marrs
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2023–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 36.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert