← Search

Theresa Carlson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Minneapolis, MN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
222 matches · 132W–90L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history222 matches
W
2026-10-27 · Reiling-Stout ES 18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Hong
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-21 · Jorgenson-Bowles Point Taken · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lily Fredericks
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-09-15 · O'Brien: Party is at the Net · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary O'Brien
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-12 · Kreutzer: South Metro Mixed · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andy Bonifas mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · O'Brien: Party is at the Net · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Genevieve Swanson
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennie Kawaters championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennie Kawaters championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · O'Brien: Party is at the Net · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Genevieve Swanson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-04 · O'Brien: Party is at the Net · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary O'Brien
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · Jorgenson-Bowles Point Taken · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary McKie
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-07 · REILING-STOUT SUMMER 18s · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Lund
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-23 · REILING-STOUT SUMMER 18s · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennie Kawaters
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 75% of games
4.0
73.3%
74W–27L · 57.9% of games
4.5
43.2%
35W–46L · 46.6% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.7% of games
8.0mixed
53.8%
14W–12L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
46 matches
#1 Singles
11%
25 matches
#2 Singles
9%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer