← Search

Mabel Ryder

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rochester, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 67W–106L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history173 matches
W
2026-10-11 · MaLi Magic RAC 2026 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lixia Yang
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-10-04 · MaLi Magic RAC 2026 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lixia Yang
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-27 · MaLi Magic RAC 2026 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lixia Yang
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-13 · MaLi Magic RAC 2026 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lixia Yang
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-29 · Teske - Golden Girls of Summer 2026 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alice Lembach championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-23 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Cerhan championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-23 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jodi Kruse championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-22 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-15 · Acers Hagy RTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Wildfeuer championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-15 · Acers Hagy RTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keely Ryder championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Cerhan championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-14 · Acers Hagy RTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Strumpfer championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
59.3%
16W–11L · 54.9% of games
3.5
31.6%
25W–54L · 44.1% of games
4.0
47.8%
11W–12L · 47.4% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 51.8% of games
6.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 59.1% of games
7.0mixed
23.8%
5W–16L · 38.3% of games
8.0mixed
9.1%
1W–10L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
27 matches
#1 Singles
12%
20 matches
#2 Singles
9%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe