← Search

Jodi Kruse

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rochester, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
166 matches · 91W–75L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history166 matches
L
2026-10-24 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Cerhan championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-23 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Colby championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-23 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Colby championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-20 · Anderson/Nguyen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Roth
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-11 · Khan Crew RAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rhonda Khan
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-04 · Khan Crew RAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rhonda Khan
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-30 · Teske - Golden Girls of Summer 2026 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Teske championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-29 · Teske - Golden Girls of Summer 2026 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Teske championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-23 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Colby championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mabel Ryder championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Cerhan championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-21 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Colby championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
67.1%
53W–26L · 55.4% of games
4.0
36.4%
16W–28L · 45.3% of games
7.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.5% of games
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.9% of games
7.0mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 46.2% of games
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
19 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
3%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe