← Search

David Adelstein

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
South Pasadena, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 56W–83L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history139 matches
W
2026-09-27 · SGV Merry Pranskters-Adelstein-Live Oaks/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hilary MacGregor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-15 · SGV Merry Pranskters-Adelstein-Live Oaks/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with CARA Yokomizo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-01 · SGV Merry Pranskters-Adelstein-Live Oaks/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leilani Scholtz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-25 · SGV Silver Servers-Schiffman-Scholl/SU10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Aret Damla
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-18 · SGV Merry Pranskters-Adelstein-Live Oaks/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joanna Gardner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · SGV Merry Pranskters-Adelstein-Live Oaks/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hilary MacGregor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-20 · SGV Silver Servers-Schiffman-Scholl/SU10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Baker
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-14 · SGV Silver Servers-Schiffman-Scholl/SU10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Baker
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · SGV Silver Servers-Schiffman-Scholl/SU10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Baker
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-30 · SGV Silver Servers-Schiffman-Scholl/SU10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Aret Damla
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-10 · SGV Silver Servers-Schiffman-Scholl/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeffrey Korerat
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-26 · SGV Silver Servers-Schiffman-Scholl/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dan Schiffman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
43.1%
28W–37L · 47.6% of games
3.5
27.3%
9W–24L · 37.9% of games
6.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 56.3% of games
7.0
20%
3W–12L · 37.2% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
31 matches
#1 Singles
19%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
20 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova