← Search

Tay Sisoukrath

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Benton, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
224 matches · 129W–95L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history224 matches
W
2026-10-06 · Massey/LR/Burns · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brice Sisco
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-16 · Massey/LR/Burns · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ryan Allmond
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-08 · Massey/LR/Burns · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jarred Kibbey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-01 · Sisoukrath/Benton/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jesse Converse
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-16 · Sisoukrath/Benton/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Cortright mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-15 · Sisoukrath/Benton/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaitlyn Witherell mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-22 · Sisoukrath/Benton/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Steel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-02 · Sisoukrath/Benton/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Cortright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Sisoukrath/Benton/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Howell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · Sisoukrath/Benton/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Howse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-27 · Sisoukrath/Benton/Rebs · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Rike
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-19 · Sisoukrath/Benton/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JP Wade
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams91 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 73.1% of games
2.75
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
72.7%
24W–9L · 59.5% of games
3.5
48.3%
28W–30L · 50.1% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 39.4% of games
5.5
70%
7W–3L · 63.6% of games
6.5
69.2%
18W–8L · 57.9% of games
7.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 49.1% of games
2.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 49.2% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
69.2%
18W–8L · 60.6% of games
7.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 49.1% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
51 matches
#2 Singles
5%
11 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe